| 1 | Jeffrey Svajlenko and Chanchal K. Roy and Slawomir Duszynski
ForkSim: Generating software forks for evaluating cross-project similarity analysis tools
13th {IEEE} International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, {SCAM} 2013, Eindhoven, Netherlands, September 22-23, 2013, 2013. |
|
| | Abstract: Available soon... |
| | @INPROCEEDINGS{svajlenko_SCAM_13,
author = {Jeffrey Svajlenko and Chanchal K. Roy and Slawomir Duszynski},
title = {ForkSim: Generating software forks for evaluating cross-project similarity analysis tools},
booktitle = {13th {IEEE} International Working Conference on Source Code Analysis and Manipulation, {SCAM} 2013, Eindhoven, Netherlands, September 22-23, 2013},
year = {2013},
address = {},
month = {},
pages = {37--42}
} |
| 2 | Chanchal K. Roy and James R. Cordy
A Mutation/Injection-Based Automatic Framework for Evaluating Code Clone Detection Tools
Second International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation, {ICST} 2009, Denver, Colorado, USA, April 1-4, 2009, Workshops Proceedings, 2009. |
|
| | Abstract: Available soon... |
| | @INPROCEEDINGS{roy_ICSTW_09,
author = {Chanchal K. Roy and James R. Cordy},
title = {A Mutation/Injection-Based Automatic Framework for Evaluating Code Clone Detection Tools},
booktitle = {Second International Conference on Software Testing Verification and Validation, {ICST} 2009, Denver, Colorado, USA, April 1-4, 2009, Workshops Proceedings},
year = {2009},
address = {},
month = {},
pages = {157--166}
} |
| 3 | Chanchal K. Roy and James R. Cordy
A Mutation / Injection-based Automatic Framework for Evaluating Code Clone Detection Tools
Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Mutation Analysis (MUTATION'09)Denver, Colorado, 1-4 April 2009. |
|
| | Abstract: In recent years many methods and tools for software clone detection have been proposed. While some work has been done on assessing and comparing performance of these tools, very little empirical evaluation has been done. In particular, accuracy measures such as precision and recall have only been roughly estimated, due both to problems in creating a validated clone benchmark against which toolscan be compared, and to the manual effort required to hand check large numbers of candidate clones. In this paper we propose an automated method for empirically evaluating clone detection tools that leverages mutation-based techniques to overcome these limitations by automatically synthesizing large numbers of known clones based on an editing theory of clone creation. Our framework is effective in measuring recall and precision of clone detection tools for various types of fine-grained clones in real systems without manual intervention. |
| | @INPROCEEDINGS{RoyC09,
author = {Chanchal K. Roy and James R. Cordy},
title = {A Mutation / Injection-based Automatic Framework for Evaluating Code Clone Detection Tools},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the 4th International Workshop on Mutation Analysis (MUTATION'09)},
year = {2009},
address = {Denver, Colorado},
month = {1-4 April},
pages = {157-166}
} |
| 4 | Chanchal K. Roy and James R. Cordy
Towards a Mutation-based Automatic Framework for Evaluating Code Clone Detection Tools
Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (C3S2E'08)Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 12-13 May 2008. |
|
| | Abstract: Available soon... |
| | @INPROCEEDINGS{RoyC08,
author = {Chanchal K. Roy and James R. Cordy},
title = {Towards a Mutation-based Automatic Framework for Evaluating Code Clone Detection Tools},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Canadian Conference on Computer Science and Software Engineering (C3S2E'08)},
year = {2008},
address = {Montreal, Quebec, Canada},
month = {12-13 May},
pages = {137-140}
} |
